Presto2 wrote:
We are looking ahead to 2010 -
Have been to Yllas twice and are tempted by Saariselka as it looks just the right place for us.
Has anyone else been ?
:think
Yes, to both of them. Several times, though not in the last two or three years. We live in Finland, so know most of the northern resorts. Rather depends what you are looking for, in my view. I would pick Ylläs over Saariselkä for downhill/slalom skiing any day, especially as it has at least one ski-in, ski-out hotel (Ylläs Saga, with a spa), but if you are into X-country skiing, Saariselkä is a veritable Mecca for the sport, with hosts of tracks of differing degrees of difficulty. If you are more into sleighrides and skidoos and stuff, both can offer those sort of services. Saariselkä has a certain advantage in that the village is more compact. If you've been to Ylläs you will know that it's two centres divided by a fell, and this sometimes makes for a nuisance. There are no slopeside hotels in Saariselkä - you have to take the skibus. The hills aren't bad - we were pleasantly surprised, as we'd been led to believe the place was more or less ONLY for the X-country brigade. Oh, and the Japanese tourist couples who go to look at the Northern Lights and then conceive their children under them (supposed to be lucky - go figure).
Saariselkä is a bit closer perhaps to the REAL Lapland in the sense that you are within a stone's throw of Ivalo and Inari, which are populated by Sámis - the indigenous minority population who really own the place.
Both would be great in the late winter/early spring, when you can pretend you are in the Alps, as the sun is great, it's not cold, and the snow lasts all the way down (unlike the porridge one gets in Austria or France at low altitudes or on the last run home). Both can be brass-monkey country if you are daft enough to go in January.
I'd offer you a raft of links, but it seems the administrators feel I am not yet to be trusted with something as dangerous as that. So I'm not quite sure how I'd go about getting them to you. There are, by the way, other resorts up there that might be worth considering. Again, I don't know if you are planning to do this independently or as part of some package thing through an operator, but you could just as easily consider
Levi (not far from Ylläs, and with better slopes taken all round - Ylläs is fine on the upper slopes, but they can be windy or snowed-in - complete fell white-out, makes for quite hairy skiing - and the lower slopes are a waste of space IMHO), or
Ruka, a bit further south and east.
There are other, smaller resorts, too. If you are good downhill skiers,
Pyhä probably has the most challenging skiing, with some decent off-piste as well.
Suomu could also be interesting - we're going there in March, but that's mainly because we know people up there. Basically you can find all of these I've mentioned by simply sticking three ws in front of the word and fi behind it. All should have English-language sites. Swap the ä for an a and you'll hit Pyhä and Saariselkä the same way.
Let me know what it is you are after, and I might be able to help more.