For example, BHIC's comments about the Rio Park contradict most of the reports on our reviews page, and so quoting the date of your trip might be more beneficial than suggesting that it should be avoided "like the plague". Did you submit a review of the Rio Park, BHIC ? Or does your stay at the hotel pre-date our hotel reviews site ?
I stayed in the Rio Park in October 2002. I have submitted reviews of this Hotel, and I'm almost sure I posted a review on HT but I cannot find it now. It may have been on another similar site. I appreciate your comments David, and the last thing I would want to do is to dissuade someone from booking this Hotel if that is their choice. I have read the reviews about the Rio Park on the Hotel Reviews pages, but I am afraid based on my own personal experience, I could never stay there again. All I can say is that I thought the general idea of HT was to tell the truth as one sees it, and I could not recommend the Rio Park as a place to stay. It was in October 2005 when I had a look around following the refurbishment, and I was not very impressed.
Maybe things have changed at the Rio in the past few years, but based on what I observed last October, I doubt that very much. But what I would consider rubbish, someone else might consider gold....we are all different and we all have different standards and expectations. The cockroach infestation at the Rio Park when I stayed there was enough tp put me off from returning to the Rio ever again. Especially when I have stayed at far superior Hotels (The Venus and The Castillia) since then.
Just my humble opinion and I appreicate its not everyones, but the original poster asked if fellow HT members could recommend one of three Hotels....I could not comment on the other two as I have not stayed at these Hotels....I posted my comments on the Rio Park in good faith based upon my memories of a very unpleasant stay there. And I would never book to stay there again, no matter how cheap it was or what Special Offers/Deals were available. I'd sooner pay a little more for a better Hotel.
Another thing I remember about the Rio Park (which I agree may now be different, although there was no sign of this when we had a look around last October) was the smoking. There were no designated No Smoking areas in any of the Public areas of the Hotel. The whole building stank of stale nicotine. To get to the covered 'aviary' area outside you had to walk through the bar and the smell of stale smoke in there was overwhelming, it hit you in your eyes, and you had to hold your hand over your mouth and make a dash for it. Plus, I also remember in the large lounge, kids and youths were just left to run riot, climbing all over the seating with their trainers on, and generally making a noise. In fact the seating at that time was in tatters. Now the lounge looks like an Airport Departure Lounge with plastic seating and bright garish lights.
The Lifts were another major problem when I stayed there, and although I understand a further lift has been installed now, I honestly don't see how that one extra lift is going to make that much difference when you take into consideration the sheer size of the Hotel and the large number of rooms.
Maybe my comments about
avoiding it like the plague were perhaps a little strong, but when I wrote them I was thinking of the cockroaches crawling all over the Dining Room and on the dinner plates, which is something I can never forget. Maybe standards have improved since then, but I would still never stay there again.
(Edited:- following David's reminder that I actually stayed at the Rio Park in 2000, and NOT 2002, as I have stated above. Many apologies)