If Pandora decides to go I hope she has a great holiday, at least she had the sense to come on and ask a few questions about it, and we wonder why we dont get many new members.
Just so we don't offend him any further let's be clear that Pandora is a young man wanting to go on holiday with his girlfriend. I'm sorry if my attempt to lighten the tone by making reference to his username confused matters.
I'm not sure anybody mentioned transferring a few thousand pounds,I did say that I would transfer some emergency money if needed.
It was me that mentioned a few thousand pounds, Oscarben, and that's because one of my 'comfort blankets' is knowing that I have the security of being able to flash the plastic to make sure that I or my travelling companions, for example, do get taken to the ER rather than being left on the pavement by the paramedics and that we are treated whilst the insurance situation is sorted etc because I can re-assure the clinic/hospital that I have the wherewithal to pay. Thankfully, I've never yet had to do that but it lets me rest easier knowing that I can. And I'd certainly rest easier knowing that my nieces could to if it ever became necessary.
I don't think that there have been lots of judgemental comments - I do think that some very good advice and tips to think about have been passed on. We're all capable of doing stupid things in our lives at any age and of course turning 18 doesn't suddenly turn you from an immature child into a responsible adult but a lot of laws are based on the assumption that it does and that can have implications for travellers under 18 as Oscarben and others have pointed out. There are things that youc an do once you turn 18 that you can't do if you are still only 17 regardless of how sensible you are. Even in the UK, the law is filled with anomalies over at what age you can and can't legally do things - it could be just as big a minefield for under 17s travelling on their own to UK.
For example, the general guiding principle in the UK is that over 16s can give consent in relation to their own medical treatment and that parental consent is needed for under 16s. But this isn't hard and fast - under 16s can withhold their consent for medical treatment if the clinicians are sure that they fully understand the implications of doing so, in which case their decision is respected and parents cannot automatically insist that they are treated unless they go to court to have the clinicians decision overturned. And this is far from guaranteed - the courts have upheld the right of some under 16s to decide, for examle, that they would prefer to die than undergo yet more treatment for incurable cancers.
Likewise if the clinicians aren't convinced that an over 16 is competent to make the decision and provide informed consent for both treament and non-treatment they can insist that a parent/guardian or the courts consent (or withhold it) on their behalf. It only happens rarely but in the end whether a 17 yr old could or couldn't consent to treatment on their own behalf will in the first instance depend on the clinicians assessment of their ability/capacity to provide informed consent. More information can be found at the link below but to avoid potential delay in receiving anything more than palliative care until consent is obtained, anybody who 16/17 yrs old travelling to the UK on their own would still be well advised to bring a letter with them confirming that their parents/guardians are willing for them to agree to provide their own consent for treatment. And anybody over 18 but responsible for an under 16 yr old certainly needs to bring with them evidence that the parents have given their permission for them to consent on the parents' behalf if necessary.
http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Consent-to-treatment/Pages/How-does-it-work.aspx
SM