Don't know if this the right forum to post about this, but have noticed that this company is advertising a lot on TV at the moment. It seems to fill the gap that foreign car insurance creates by not giving proper 100% all inclusive comprehensive insurance.
We were horrified on a recent trip to Nice to find that no matter which company we tried, there seems to be a £200 - £500 excess. So if your hire car gets damaged when you're not in it you're liable. Similarly if your windscreen gets hit by a stone,etc , you're liable. Thid just seems to be a giant rip-off! When we were enquiring ther was an English group arguing over alleged damage when they were returning their vehicle.We decided to not bother & stick to public transport. I'm sure the same rules have applied in other countries, but I don't think the excess was so great an amount.
It seems ironic that we could drive our own car from Ireland to Greece & back & be completely comprehensively insured, but can't hire a car on the continent with the same conditions.
This company charges £49 for European cover & it doesn't sound too bad. ( this is of course in addition to whatever insurance you pay locally ) Does anyone know anything about this or even think this is a good idea, as we're heading to Gran Canaria in a few weeks and hoping to hire a car, so it would make sense to do this now if the consensus is in favour.
Thanks for your opinions!
I have no personal experience of companies such as the one you mention, but I think their main aim is to cover you personally (not the car) for the cost of those uninsured damages, and the cost of excess charges in relation to any insured damage. But I imagine that if you decline the rental company's optional excess waiver charge, you will have to pay a substantial deposit up front to cover the cost of any possible damages. That could be up to £500, perhaps even more depending on the group of vehicle, the age of the drivers, the country which you are hiring in, etc. Any damage costs would then be deducted from that deposit, which you would have to reclaim separately from your own insurer when you come home. So you would still need an acceptable debit/credit card to cover the hefty deposit at the time of rental.
There are no doubt pros and cons with such a scheme, and it's probably a case of reading that all important small print.
David
Reading the printout it seems they are covering damage to the car/undercarriage/ windows etc. In fact the bit the others leave out. So maybe it is a good deal..........i suppose you need to be hiring a few times during the year to make it worth while, but it seems a reasonable enough way to get peace of mind. Will investigate further!
This company has been recommended to me by people on other travel sites.To be fair I havent heard of anyone who has had to claim,so dont know what they are like that way but on the face of it seems to be a good idea.Will post if i find out any more
My reading is that the insurance cover is for the named driver - additional premiums seem applicable for a second driver.
You are required to pay any charges prior to the claim.
They will check that any insurance cover applicable to the vehicle does not cover what you are claiming. Should that be the case and you have paid up then you will need to try to get your money back.
I do think, as we often say on HT you need to read the terms and conditions fully before you sign up.
They claim that CDW does not cover everything, and in certain cases that can be correct. I do wonder if it is as good as claimed.
If you deal with a reputable company then you do not get "hidden extras"
In all my years in the motor trade and involvement with vehicle hire, tyres were always the responsibility of the driver.
They claim they are covered, but then how many people have tyre problems. In a two year period of vehicle hire we had one puncture on the fleet.
Damage caused to the underside would indicate to me that someone was taking a vehicle over an unsuitable surface. Funny how many think a RAV4 is an "all terrain vehicle?"
And there is the problem. ALL insurance cover has a duty of care - I rather think that you would need to prove that you had not been driving in an inappropriate way.
If it gives you peace of mind then fine. From a personal point - and accepting that I do have some specialist knowledge of insurance of hire vehicles. I would not bother.
fwh
Unless you are someone who would worry too much about driving if you weren't completely covered for all eventualities, I too wouldn't bother. At the end of the day though, it's entirely your choice.
This company seems to solve this problem. I'm still debating the issue, but don't think £49 is excessive as we usually are abroad 3 times a year.
"In relation to your query regarding the calculations please note this is based on the document received from Auto Europcar which states Total Euro is €227.21 :
damage to vehicle = €88.50
damage report fee = €35.00 - not covered
Loss of profit fee = €60.00 not covered
Total £183.51
20% VAT £36.70 - not covered
Postal fee 7.00 - not covered
Total as per invoice = €227.21
If you could provide me with the requested bank details your claim will be settled for €88.50.".
Of course the policy doesn't disclose that almost everything is not included.
If you are looking for peace of mind when hiring a car i surely don't recommand this company. For a around 25% more you get a CDW that actully covers that excess fee.
Interesting........... and very disappointing. We've taken out their cover most years to cover car rentals. Fortunately have never needed to claim, but your experience has made me think. I will definitely be scanning the small print before I use this company again.
damage to vehicle = €88.50 - Sounds about right. A Dings & Dents repair in the UK would have been a lot less.
damage report fee = €35.00 - not covered. Profit Maker.
Loss of profit fee = €60.00 not covered. Well yes I could understand that if they actually repaired it but they will simply note it on the next hire as a defect. Or Not - and charge some other poor mug.
Total £183.51
20% VAT £36.70 - not covered = Rubbish - They can reclaim VAT.
Postal fee 7.00 - not covered = What postal fee?
I have put my observations against each item. I still hold to my view back in 2006. I would not waste my money. Rather pay the excess but in recent years the companies I have hired from have always had a reasonable CDW charge.
Would be interesting to see what other companies offer the same insurance cover.
fwh
Over the past 12 months we have settled more than 99% of all claims made and are committed to maintaining this in the coming year.
If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch on info@insurance4carhire.com or call our UK call centre any time from 9-5.30 Mon-Fri 0844 892 1770.
Thank you for joining us to provide this update. It is unfortunate and disappointing that your client could not have returned to the topic to confirm this progress made in reaching a satisfactory outcome. Perhaps he may yet do so, here and on the other site(s) where the complaint was posted.
Dan
Thankfully, I have never had to make a claim but if I ever had to, I would hope not to experience this type of cover kop-out issue from I4CH's underwriters. However, it does sound like it was down to a mix-up and it's good to see that their customer services were concerned enough to post on this thread, so I will renew my policy again this year and trust that the claim on their website that they cover you against the entire excess fee means exactly that.
However, the fact that insurance4carhire actually got involved in this discussion prompted me to go ahead and buy their insurance. If I'm unlucky enough to need it I'll report back!
Post a Reply
Please sign in or register an account to reply to this post.