Holiday Complaints

Do you have a holiday complaint? For help and advice post in here.
Reply
Hi and welcome to HT!

I have copied your post to our Complaints forum where it may get a better response.

luci :wave
Reply
You probably will need to make a claim against your insurance for curtailment of the holiday.

Your holiday ended when you landed in the UK. Any expense after that (eg hotel, travel, expenses etc.) may not be covered by anybody :que

Mark :)
Reply
Mark
on another website the OP said that although her policy did cover for curtailment, her insurance company say she's not covered.

The OP was due to fly home on 30th April at 13:05 but arrived home on 24th April so lost 6 days of a 21 day holiday.
The holiday was disrupted (by uncertainty about the date she would fly home) from 21st April when she was told that they'd be flying home on 22nd April (but eventually flew home on 24th April).

I've found something on here (Section 14) in the 'Package Holiday Regulations' - link here:
opsi.gov.uk/si/si1992/Uksi_19923288_en_1.htm
that refers to
Significant Proportion of Services not Provided

and goes on to mention that (after departure), if a significant proportion of the services contracted for is not provided, the organiser will make suitable alternative arrangements, at no extra cost to the consumer, (which they did, I guess by bringing her home a week early) AND will, where appropriate, compensate the consumer for the difference between the services to be supplied under the contract and those supplied.

Shouldn't those 6 days lost have a value?
Or does the fact it was caused by a volcano mean that 'all bets are off'?

I've suggested that the OP check Olympic's Terms & Conditions to see if it says anything about changes to holidays AFTER departure.
Reply
I'm confused by the chronology of this - do you have definite written confirmation that the reason why your Monarch flights for the 30th were cancelled and you were required to come home early was because of the ash cloud? I ask because the shutdowns started on the 15 April and on the 21st April all UK air space was still closed and didn't re-open until the 24th when you came home. I would have assumed that the first priority for all the airlines would have been to get people home who should have been travelling from the 15th onwards - not bringing home early people who weren't due back until the end of April anyway. It just seems strange that Monarch were cancelling flights more than a week in advance when UK airspace was only being closed down for much shorter timespans, that is for something like 24/48 hrs at a time. Also, I can't work out why Monarch even had the space for you on a flight on the 24th when there must have been plenty of others who'd been delayed by up to a week or more who'd have been anxious to get home as quickly as possible. It strikes me that there has to be more to this than just the ash cloud to explain what went wrong.
SM
Reply
I wondered the same thing SMa, surely they couldn't predict how long the cloud would be around & it was quite possible that it would have cleared by their original departure date :que
Reply
Glynis & SMa

I remember reading a link that said that Monarch had decided to cancel the rest of the flights to Goa, the last flight back for the season would have either been the one that the OP was booked on (30th April) or possibly 2nd May (I know that MON2491 comes back on Sundays but don't know if was the last this year. It is for 2011, returning Sunday 1st May 2011).

So that's why Lolo had to come back 6 days early.

BUT - having just thought about that, if the skies were clear after 24th April then neither Olympic nor Monarch can directly blame the curtailment of Lolo's holiday on the volcano.
Surely it was an operational decision made by Monarch.

SMa - good point about space on the 24/4 flight.
Unless Monarch had been putting on more flights than normal to repatriate those people who were stranded.
I do know that they put on a much smaller plane for one flight that had to refuel in the Middle East.
Reply
Lack of information to really answer the question. No doubt the uncertainty of the length of the closure/disruption will have played a part. If an airline/TO was told of a safe window for flights then it is possible they changed things and so enable them to get people back.

We must not forget that it is not only the UK that has been effected. The dispersal of the cloud over the continent has created problems for other countries. Whilst the UK may be clear I am aware that airspace over the continent has created problems and UK flights have been diverted around some areas.

There are two problems that come out of this that do not seem to have been properly addressed. First is the media publishing the advice of their armchair experts that is patently misleading. But then their own interests are not served by telling the unvarnished truth. Why spoil a good story when you can turn a one act play into a blockbuster.

The second, and in my opinion the more important are the TOs/Airlines who have been so busy putting out press releases they have not considered if what they are saying is what people want to know. Yes I do know they value my business and my safety is of concern, but why not just explain in simple language why they have taken the action they have and forget the window dressing? In this case there is probably a very simple explanation but finding out what is hard work.

fwh
Reply
Holiday Truths Forum

Post a Reply

Please sign in or register an account to reply to this post.

Sign in / Register

Holiday Truths Forum Ship image

Get the best deals!

from our cruise, ski and holiday partners

You can change your email preferences at any time.

Yes, I want to save money by receiving personalised travel emails with awesome deals from Holiday Truths group companies which are hotholidays.co.uk,getrcuising.co.uk and getskiing.co.uk. By subscribing I agree to the Privacy Policy

No, thank you.