Brunn,
The only story I've seen is this:
"Oil slick catastrophe
The Daily Telegraph counts the environmental cost with a satellite image of a catastrophic oil slick.
It is spreading northwards along the Lebanese coastline as a result of the bombing by the Israelis on an oil depot south of Beirut.
The paper says the 12,000-ton slick stretches 70 miles with experts warning the spill might reach the beaches of Turkey, Cyprus and Greece.
It says Israel's refusal to provide aerial pictures hampers any response."
Considering the wildlife in that area, I hope its not as bad as what is being reported. Currents in the Med are gentle so this will linger for a long time unless something is done about it sharpish. This could end up being quite a major incident, probably the worst the Med has ever experienced. If its true (you can never trust figures quoted in papers!) and there is a 70 mile / 12,000 ton slick, its a major dissaster.
I'm off to Icmeler in 3 weeks and will be diving half the time I'm there. The wildlife in the eastern Med isn't the most proliffic but sensitive. Events such as these can have huge consequencies for many years.
EDIT:
Here's an update from the area. Sounds as bad as they feared. Yet another avoidable environmental dissaster.
Darren