I should hope it is, considering it's supposed to be an International Airport serving an English City and not some remote Island with more sheep than people.
There's small and modern and there's small and a hole.
I dread to think what some passengers from abroad must think when passing through it, they must think they have come to a third world country.
It's a disgrace and it sounds like it hasn't improved one iota in 20 years.
While it is a very basic airport, I don't think I'd use the word disgrace.
The facilities at Coventry are temporary, and were put up in 2004. Unfortunately they have proved to be a whole lot less temporary than anyone had ever hoped, by all rights Coventry should be using its brand new terminal by now, but see my earlier rant about Warwick District Council.
Being temporary, the faciltiies are very basic, and the airport would be the first to admit that, but for 99% of the time the airport copes very well. Granted, your Thomsonfly experience was pretty awful, and I don't blame you for feeling upset and angered by it. But that is not the fault of Coventry airport, and perhaps your impression of it is scarred a little by the fact you were delayed for so long, moved airports etc...
I flew from Coventry in February for the first time. Where else in the UK can you turn up less than an hour before your flight leaves with absolutely no worry of missing your flight?!?! Where else in the UK can you be from touchdown to car in 15 minutes, including immigration, baggage reclaim and customs?!?!?! At Birmingham you'd be lucky to be on stand 15 minutes after landing! A disgrace?! A pleasure more like!
Ok, it is not ideal, and I concede I wouldn't fancy being delayed there one bit. Ok, Thomsonfly totally up with your flight, but a delay situation is no fun at any airport?