I don't think any of the above apply to a Thomson package holiday, which is what doepsmc is making enquiries about. I've been on 4, and 3 were thomson planes, 1 was thomas cook where they have the same ruling regarding food & seating arrangements. I would say it's highly likely that if you didn't pay the meal option you wouldn't get one AND you would have the pleasure of the back of the plane
Fair comment. And I'm sure you are correct. All I can say from a personal point of view is that since the Airlines (or whoevers decision it was) decided to start charging extra for In flight meals, there has been a lot of confusion and some very angry and dissapointed passengers on the flights I have been on since this new system was implemented.
I simply refuse now to to pay £10, £12 for something I may not actually get or for something that may already be included as part of the In Flight service, and thus get free anyway.
My Holiday to Benidorm last October WAS indeed a Thomson Package Deal and when we were in the Travel Agency (Then known as Lunn Poly, now the Thomson Shop) we were asked if we wanted to pay EXTRA for an In Flight Meal. However, we were NOT informed that the flight would be operated by Air Europa, whose policy is NOT to provide a
HOT In Flight meal, but rather to provide
FREE sandwiches.
Now if I had paid that £10 surcharge up font in the Travel Ageny, I would have been extremely angry on board when I was presented with my shoebox containing two dried up sandwiches, as indeed many passengers were. I overheard one asking the Flight Attendant for her Hote meal, and the attendant replied:
"I'm sorry ma'm we don't provide hot meals on Air Europa Charter Flights". ( I believe they DO provide meals on their Sheduled Services though ). And bear in mind I would have ALREADY paid the supplement up front as part of my holiday costs. What would have been my chances of getting a refund?
Also what you have to bear in mind is that if you want an In flight Meal and are prepared to pay the additional supplement for one, then ALL persons in your party MUST pay for a meal as well. THis means that even if one of your family members does not want a meal on board, they must still pay for one. I do not agree with that personally. So for example if there are SIX passengers in your group and only THREE want a meal, then that means the cost for those meals will set you back £60 or £72. Now thats a hell of a lot of money if only three people in your group have a meal. You could pay that for a full three course meal in a posh restuarant somewhere. Or another way to look at it is (assuming once again you are in a party of six), £72 for twenty four sandwiches (and bare in mind thats all you may be offered) is one hell of a lot of money.
Ok, I'm just making up some expamples here that will obvioulsy not apply to everyone. I'm sure if you do your homework well in advance and make enquiries direct with the airline prior to departure, then you should have no problems. I've never gone DIY, but can any of the HT members who do holiday DIY advise how they get on?
I agree, I cannot comment in as far as other Airlines are concerned. MY last experience with a Thomson Flight was on board a Britannia Aircraft (and please note Britannia no longer exists, its been merged into the TUI company and is now known as ThomsonFly), and there was utter chaos. The Flight Attendants simply had no idea who had paid for meals and who had not. They did have a Passenger Manifest to which they made reference to, but apparantley there was just a hand written tick by those who had paid and those who had not. Now how can that be replied upon? The attendants were subject to all sorts of abuse (NOT from me I hasten to add) from Passengers who HAD paid for a meal but were refused one because they could not prove it. In the end they had to retrieve their hand luggage and show the attendants there Booking Forms.
What a palaver!!!
Now, without deviating from this subject, but just as a matter of interest, can you please tell me why in your humble opinion its better to be sat at the back of an aircraft? Without trying to sound all doom and gloom, I was always under the impression that the rear of an aircraft was the worst possible place to be sat in the event of a crash. The rear seats are the least survivable, or so I have been told.